It has, obviously, been a very long time since I have posted here. There have been a number of upheavals in my personal life, which have seemed to be higher priorities than blog posting. My life has stabilized somewhat, but I am unsure about how regularly I will be able to post given my new equilibrium. That said, I recently found myself engaged in a conversation on social media about abortion, and at the end of that discussion I realized that it wouldn’t take much effort to convert my contributions to that discussion into a page for this site that I have been intending to write for some time: a case-study of pragmatic ethics. I am therefore pleased to present: Abortion: A Case-Study in Pragmatic Ethics. Enjoy!
Ok, I have added the first page in a long time. I have at least one comment thread I am behind on as well, which I will get back to soon. Life issues have been extremely distracting for the last… well… year. And they haven’t STOPPED being distracting, but I felt the need to wade back in anyway. So I hereby present The Resurrection: So What?
Well, two days back and two new pages! Clearly, that’s an unsustainable rate, but hey, it feels good to be posting again. Today I have added another page on evolution, addressing selected specific creationist claims. Any claims that you would like me to add to the page, just let me know in the comments!
Oh, and apparently WordPress has changed something about the comments… they aren’t on by default on new pages. I have fixed that for yesterday’s page as well.
Thanks for reading, and as always, I welcome any questions, comments, or corrections!
It has been a tough year, for reasons I’m not going to go into here, and that difficulty has kept me distracted from this website. Hopefully, I am now going to be able to resume posting. Regardless, I now have a new page added, this one a primer on evolution. For anyone that has had a college-level biology class, this will probably include nothing new; it is primarily targeted for creationists who think they understand evolution, but actually don’t. I expect that an upcoming post will probably be in an FAQ format, addressing common creationist misconceptions. As always, I welcome any comments or questions. Thank you for reading!
I have had a number of real-life issues that have kept me from being able to blog, but hopefully I will be able to return to blogging sometime in the near future. In the meantime, I thought I would add a page where I have collected some of the work I have done under another of my alter egos, Dr. Countermeme. Enjoy!
In my continuing series on an atheistic ethical system, I have added a new essay concerning Pragmatic Ethics. In many ways this is a culmination of a series of essays exploring the middle ground between absolute morality and moral relativism. I expect there will be at least one further essay in the series, but that one will be more of an application example of Pragmatic Ethics (to the case study of abortion) rather than a development of new ideas.
As always, I welcome any feedback, positive, negative, or neutral. Thank you for reading!
It appears that Carrier has posted an hour-long seminar that he gave summarizing his work in the book that I just summarized myself. This talk was, I believe, being given to his funders. I still think that my summary is likely to be useful, because I wasn’t constrained by time the same way he was, and thus I was able to more comprehensively address the arguments and counterarguments. Still, for anyone that is intimidated by the length of my posts, I highly recommend this seminar.
I have completed my project of summarizing and reorganizing Richard Carrier’s book, On the Historicity of Jesus: Why We Might Have Reason for Doubt. I very much hope that some of you find it useful or interesting. Any of you that do, I hope that you will purchase the book to explore the arguments and evidence in greater detail.
If any of the arguments that I outline aren’t clear, please let me know in the comments and I will try to revise my summaries. I, as always, welcome any and all comments, questions, suggestions, criticisms, and so on.
I am getting close to done with my project summarizing Richard Carrier’s book, On the Historicity of Jesus: Why We Might Have Reason for Doubt. You can look at my previous blog entries or the page itself if you are interested in more background on what I am doing and why. I have one more major chapter to do, covering the Epistles, and then the conclusions, but everything else is now done. This has been a lot of work, and I’m feeling somewhat exhausted as a result, so I would definitely welcome any feedback at all, even negative, so that I can have some indication that someone, anyone, is finding what I’ve done useful. The last bits will probably get done next weekend.
Several weeks ago, I finished reading Richard Carrier’s book, On the Historicity of Jesus: Why We Might Have Reason for Doubt. This book has completely flipped my evaluation of the subject, and now instead of considering it more likely than not that there was a historical figure based on whom the Jesus mythology developed, I have now come to agree with Carrier that Jesus probably originated as a celestial deity that was later falsely placed in history.
Unfortunately, Carrier’s book is a very difficult and lengthy read, so I fear that many people that are interested in its subject matter will not read it. That, plus wanting to be able to answer my wife’s question, “So what was his argument that convinced you?” I have begun the daunting project of condensing and slightly reorganizing his work into a more digestible form. I am not done yet, but I have worked my way up through Chapter 8 of the book, which was the chapter that more than any other shifted my opinion. I therefore have now posted my series of essays on this book, which should be viewed as a work-in-progress. Even my summary is long, for which I apologize. But I think it is worth the read. As always, I welcome any and all feedback, be it positive, negative, curious, or whatever. Enjoy!